Views: 0<\/p>
[Note: \u00a0<\/strong>This MS is available in \u00a0<\/strong>larger font on our Brief Articles 2<\/strong> \u00a0page.]<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0The Bible speaks of the hand, the arm, the finger, the eye, the ear, the face, and even the “hinder parts” of God. Are we to take these terms literally or are they figures of speech the inspired writers employed to help us relate to the Infinite? The Pagan religions have consistently attributed literal physical characteristics of various creatures (including men) to their false concepts of God (Rom. 1:22\u201323). However, the nature of true Deity is beyond and above such physical forms: \u201cGod is Spirit\u201d (John 4:24), and \u201ca spirit hath not flesh and bones\u201d (Luke 24:39).\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0 The notable exception to this, of course, is the Incarnate Word, the Christ, who \u201cbecame flesh and dwelt among us\u201d (John 1:14). Paul’s description of the Incarnation is similar: Our Lord existed \u201cin the form of God\u201d while with the Father, but He \u201cemptied himself…being made in the likeness of men\u201d (Phi. 2:6\u20137). Obviously, the \u201cform of God\u201d is not the same as the \u201cform of man,\u201d otherwise there would have been no need for Him to become flesh and be made in the likeness of men. To attribute literal physical form to the true and living God is to make God in man’s image. Those who do so doubtless believe they are being true to the Word of God. However, they are just as mistaken as Roman Catholicism, which insists on taking literally Jesus\u2019 words concerning the unleavened bread (\u201cThis is my body\u201d) and the fruit of the vine (\u201cThis is my blood\u201d) (Mat. 26:26, 28). The actual name of the figure of speech that attributes human characteristics and forms to God is anthropomorphism<\/em> (a Greek word which literally means \u201chuman form\u201d). For failure to recognize it as a figure of speech the Mormon Cult insists that both the Father and the Son have fleshly bodies and are material beings. It is not difficult to understand that when our Lord said, \u201cI am the door\u201d (John 10:9), He did not mean that He literally was a slab of material attached to a post by hinges that could be opened or closed. No, we correctly perceive that He used a figure of speech and that His meaning is that there are some ways in which He behaves as a door. So it is with the human parts and traits that are attributed to God in Scripture. Deity, in His very nature, is infinitely above anything we in our finiteness can conceive, and thus He is sometimes described in terms with which we are familiar and which we can grasp. Those who think they are being true to God’s Word by taking these descriptions of God literally (and that those who do not are disloyal to the Word of God) are actually the ones who fail to handle the Word correctly (2 Tim. 2:15).<\/span><\/p>\n [Note:<\/strong> I wrote this article for and it appeared in the Denton Record-Chronicle, <\/em>Denton, TX, September 29, 2006].<\/span><\/p>\n Attribution:<\/strong> From thescripturecache.com<\/em>; Dub McClish, owner and administrator.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Views: 0[Note: \u00a0This MS is available in \u00a0larger font on our Brief Articles 2 \u00a0page.] \u00a0The Bible speaks of the hand, the arm, the finger, the eye, the ear, the face, and even the “hinder parts” of God. Are we to take these terms literally…<\/p>\n