Views: 0<\/p>
[Note: <\/strong>This MS is available in larger font on our Brief Articles 1<\/strong>\u00a0page.]<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Consider this real case: The young man was an avowed atheist. He described himself as \u201ccapable of pristine thought and speech,\u2026 moral, upstanding, conscientious, ethical, loving, and forgiving\u2026and trying to do what is right.\u201d He went on: \u201cMy strength of will and my concern with the principles and rules of right conduct are profound and unwavering.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 These seemed strange words coming from one who denied the existence of God (the moral center of the universe) and the Bible (the book that reveals God\u2019s moral standards). They were even stranger in view of his living in an immoral relationship with his girl friend, a situation all too common in an increasingly secular and amoral culture. How should a Christian respond to such confusion so as possibly to help? I responded as follows:<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 No mere mortal has any basis, other than personal opinion or scruple, for discriminating between vice and virtue. Jim may decide that certain things are \u201cright,\u201d but what of Mary who rejects them? The practitioners\/defenders of abortion, euthanasia, sodomy, lesbianism, incest, pedophilia, bestiality, rape, armed robbery, or other behaviors, have the same right to their opinions\/choices as do all other subjective moralists. If such folk are wrong, by what standard? The fact is, they have none. Logically, one must accept at least the possibility that those who reject<\/strong> all of the qualities one thinks are \u201cright\u201d may be just as \u201cright.\u201d In other words, the foundation of the \u201cmoral system\u201d of every atheist is rooted firmly in thin air.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Upon what basis can anyone determine what is \u201cright\u201d (and know he is right about it)\u2014apart from an objective (i.e., independent of human origin) standard of right and wrong? The answer is, \u201cnone,\u201d which is exactly all that any have without God and His Word. It is good to appreciate noble traits and consider them as wholesome and right, but if they are right, it is not because we think so, but because God has so decreed. Without Him, no one has anything but an opinion about and personal preference for any behaviors\u2014\u201cgood\u201d or \u201cevil.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 I need help to see how one reconciles \u201ctrying very hard to be moral\u201d with fornication, unless \u201cmoral\u201d and \u201cpristine\u201d conduct include such. That \u201cprofound and unwavering concern with principles\u2026of right conduct\u201d apparently wavered a bit when he and his girl friend decided to cohabit. Let me see if I understand his moral code: Lying, stealing, greed, and hatred are verboten, but fornication is completely acceptable\u2014simply because one so defines these acts. Conveniently, subjective moralists have a way of excusing their own pet sins.<\/span><\/p>\n [Note:<\/strong> This article was written for and published in the Denton Record-Chronicle, <\/em>Denton, TX, November 21, 2014.]<\/span><\/p>\n Attribution: <\/strong>Printed from TheScripturecache.com<\/em>, owned and administered by Dub McClish.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Views: 0[Note: This MS is available in larger font on our Brief Articles 1\u00a0page.] \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 Consider this real case: The young man was an avowed atheist. He described himself as \u201ccapable of pristine thought and speech,\u2026 moral, upstanding, conscientious, ethical,…<\/p>\n