Views: 3<\/p>
[Note: <\/strong>This MS is available in\u00a0<\/strong>larger font on our Brief Articles 1<\/strong>\u00a0page.]<\/span><\/p>\n Perhaps no Christian family has escaped seeing a family member depart from the faith, either in doctrine or behavior (or in both). When a husband, wife, son, daughter, brother, or sister falls away or becomes involved in doctrinal error or support of a false teacher, what are the faithful family members to do? Can one at the same time be true to the Christ and also true to family commitments and relationships? Must one cease all association with one\u2019s kindred?<\/span><\/p>\n Relative to the husband-wife relationship in which one has been disfellowshipped, the following question was asked of the late Guy N. Woods, and his answer follows (Questions and Answers<\/em>, Vo. 2, pp. 33\u201334):<\/span><\/p>\n QUESTION: \u201cPaul forbids fraternal association with a withdrawn person, \u2018with such a one no not to eat\u2019 (1 Cor. 5:11). What is a faithful Christian wife to do when her husband is withdrawn from?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n ANSWER: It seems clear that Paul was not alluding to a relationship involving husband and wife in the passage cited. The laws of God are never in conflict; all truth is harmonious with itself, and the principles under which God ordains we are to live are never contradictory. Wives have duties to their husbands\u2014whether they are Christians or not\u2014and these duties harmonize with the obligations as Christians, as well. Marriage relationships were designed of God to take precedence over all other relationships; any situation later arising must be understood in the light of this fact. The Christian wife should therefore continue to live with her husband and use her influence to bring him to repentance. 1 Peter 3:1, though not directly applicable to this matter, nonetheless indicates the principle involved.<\/span><\/p>\n I agree with the above, with the following exception: It goes too far to say without qualification that \u201cMarriage relationships were designed of God to take precedence over all other relationships.\u201d Paul made it clear (1 Cor. 7:13\u201316) that if one\u2019s ungodly partner refuses to tolerate his\/her faithful Christian mate and abandons the marriage, the faithful mate is not obligated to prevent his\/her departure. (Note: Such a departure does not give the faithful mate the right to remarry, unless the departing mate has committed (or later commits) fornication\/adultery [Mat. 19:9].) It has long been my view that, from the context in 1 Corinthians 7, the departing one is one who finds the godly life of his\/her mate so repugnant (and perhaps limiting to his ungodliness) that he\/she abandons the \u201crestraints\u201d of the relationship. I have also long believed that the option Paul gives in verses 15\u201316 is one designed to allow the faithful mate to escape a relationship that might cause the loss of his\/her soul through the temptation to keep the relationship intact by yielding to ungodly demands of a godless mate. I realize that this passage deals with a Christian married to a non-Christian, but I see no reason why it would not apply as well to a Christian married to a disfellowshipped Christian or one who has become a reprobate, even if not disfellowshipped. He is no more in fellowship with God and faithful saints than is an unbeliever.<\/span><\/p>\n Just as the Scriptural fellowship withdrawal of a husband by the church does not sever the marriage bond or nullify the responsibilities of his faithful Christian wife, assuming this couple have children and the husband also has fleshly siblings, neither does the withdrawal nullify the parent-child relationship nor the fleshly brother-sister relationship.<\/span><\/p>\n It must, however, alter the attitude toward him of all family members who are faithful to God, so that he well understands that they do not approve of his behavior and\/or doctrine and that there will be no spiritual fellowship with him until he repents. Those who quote 2 Thessalonians 3:14 (i.e., \u201chave no company with\u201d the apostate) as an absolute with no exceptions, including family members, have simply quit reading too soon. The next verse qualifies have no company<\/em> by\u00a0saying we should not treat such a one as an enemy, but should admonish him as a brother\u2014which requires some sort of personal association\/contact. If this procedure applies regarding our behavior toward a marked Christian who is not a fleshly relative, should it apply any less to one\u2019s fleshly family members? I do not see why it should.<\/span><\/p>\n So what are parents and grandparents to do if their children and\/or grandchildren abandon the faith when they get away from home? What is one to do when a brother or sister in one\u2019s immediate family is involved in error? What is an adult child to do if his father or mother apostatizes? This quandary challenges one\u2019s best wisdom at times. Do we summarily, without exception, denounce them and tell them they cannot cross our threshold again until they repent? Do we slam the door in their faces to any further family gatherings and meals? Should we allow them to come, but make them eat in another room? Would doing such help or hinder the possibility of our ever reaching them?<\/span><\/p>\n Should we not make some allowance for dealing with such matters on a case-by-case basis, depending at least to some degree on the kind of sins involved (e.g., should a family member who has embraced agnosticism be treated in the same way as a child molester)? Certainly, we must unmistakably register our disapproval of their misdeeds and do what we can to admonish, teach, and persuade them to return, whatever their sin. However, if we summarily cut them off (as some advocate) with an absolute keep-no-company\u00a0<\/em>approach, what hope then have we of persuading and restoring them? I suggest that there is some room for judgment in dealing with this painful problem.<\/span><\/p>\n Having experienced this grief in our own family, our approach has been (and continues to be) somewhat of a middle ground. We have let the offenders know (in the strongest terms possible) our disapproval of and disagreement with their behavioral and\/or doctrinal errors. These conversations have included pointing out the fallacies of their behavior and\/or doctrine, along with strong appeals for their repentance and return to faithfulness. We have left no doubt in the minds of such ones in our family, as beloved as they are to us in the flesh, that we are not in spiritual fellowship with them in any sense or degree and that we will\/can not be, until they repent. We do not, however, bar them from family gatherings that surround them with those whom they know are diametrically opposed to their ungodly behavior and\/or damnable doctrines. We believe it would be counterproductive to our aim of restoring them if we cut them off from the only avenue of continued contact we have with them (i.e., love of family ties) and that they have with godly people.<\/span><\/p>\n [Note:\u00a0<\/strong>I wrote this article for and it was published in The Lighthouse, <\/em>weekly bulletin of Northpoint Church of Christ, Denton, TX, November 13, 2011.]<\/span><\/p>\n Attribution :<\/strong>From The Scripturecache.com<\/em>; Dub McClish, owner and administrator.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Views: 3[Note: This MS is available in\u00a0larger font on our Brief Articles 1\u00a0page.] Perhaps no Christian family has escaped seeing a family member depart from the faith, either in doctrine or behavior (or in both). When a husband, wife, son, daughter, brother, or sister falls…<\/p>\n