Views: 0<\/p>
[Note:\u00a0 <\/strong>This MS is available in larger font on our Brief Articles 1<\/strong>\u00a0 page.]<\/span><\/p>\n Jerry Lieber and Mike Stoller wrote a song thus titled, and Peggy Lee made a hit recording of it in 1969. Its lyrics somewhat reflected the cynicism and cultural breakdown our nation experienced beginning in the 1960s.<\/span><\/p>\n The question in the song\u2019s title is appropriate in matters of religion. In discussing doctrinal and denominational division, a gentleman commented, \u201cAfter you get past the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, it\u2019s all a matter of interpretation.\u201d The question is, \u201cIs that all there is, really?\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n If so, why so many books and pages in our New Testaments? Could not God have simply provided the accounts of Jesus\u2019 miracles that produce faith (John 20:30\u201331) and then said: \u201cNow this is all that matters: Believe that Jesus died for the sins of the world, was buried and on the third day arose. Interpret the rest of it any way you choose.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n Yes, Paul summarized the facts <\/strong>of the Gospel in these three bedrock events, which he had preached to the Corinthians and by which they were saved (1 Cor. 15:3\u20134). But does anyone believe that Paul literally meant \u201cthat is all there is\u201d to the Gospel? Is all of the New Testament optional but these three facts, allowing \u201cinterpretation\u201d freedoms that give credence even to direct contradictions of the inspired text? If all else is subject to variegated \u201cinterpretations,\u201d who has the right to say that those \u201cbig 3\u201d doctrines are not likewise? Actually, with little trouble, one might find modernist and\/or postmodernist theologians who leave all three of them \u201cup for grabs.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n Surely, the author of the sweeping generalization did not really mean what he said. Does he hold Paul\u2019s declaration that the Bible is God\u2019s inspired revelation to men (1 Cor. 2) as a \u201cmatter of interpretation\u201d? What about his explicit command to the church to withdraw from the fornicating brother (ch. 5), or the instructions regarding marriage (ch. 7), idolatry (chs. 8, 10), worship (11\u201314)? One cannot ignore the fact that he taught them about baptism (Acts 18:8; 1 Cor. 1:13\u201315) and reminded them that baptism was the means by which they be- came members of the body, the church (12:13; Acts 2:37\u201347).<\/span><\/p>\n Manifestly, Paul used a figure of speech when he declared: \u201cFor I determined not to know anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and him crucified\u201d (1 Cor. 2:2). That was not a description of sole content, but the theme around which his entire message revolved and from which it drew its power. So, with his summary of the Gospel facts in chapter 15. The remainder of the New Testament is not <\/strong>peripheral, optional, inconsequential, or beside the point. As the psalmist wrote: \u201cThe sum of thy words is truth\u201d 119:160).<\/span><\/p>\n [Note:<\/strong> I wrote this article for and it appeared in the Denton Record-Chronicle, <\/em>Denton, TX, October 29, 2010].<\/span><\/p>\n Attribution:<\/strong> From thescripturecache.com<\/em>; Dub McClish, owner and administrator.<\/span><\/p>\n \u00a0<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Views: 0[Note:\u00a0 This MS is available in larger font on our Brief Articles 1\u00a0 page.] Jerry Lieber and Mike Stoller wrote a song thus titled, and Peggy Lee made a hit recording of it in 1969. Its lyrics somewhat reflected the cynicism and cultural breakdown…<\/p>\n