Views: 3<\/p>
[Note<\/strong>:\u00a0 <\/strong>This MS is available in larger font on our Brief Articles 2<\/strong>\u00a0 page.]<\/span><\/p>\n Just when I think I have \u201cheard it all,\u201d something else comes along to prove that I had not. This is particularly true of the subject of marriage, divorce, and remarriage. The weird positions that have surfaced in recent years range everywhere from granting the fornicating spouse the right to remarry to redefining adultery <\/em>as merely divorcing one’s mate, and almost <\/strong>everything imaginable in between.<\/span><\/p>\n I now find that I underestimated the fertility of the human mind for giving birth to novel doctrines to justify ungodly behavior. A brother (once a preacher) is now justifying divorcing his wife on grounds of \u201cspiritual adultery\u201d (translation: she did not support him in his work and in other ways was not spiritually strong). Surely, a preacher’s greatest asset is a wife who will faithfully support his work. Indeed, every <\/strong>Christian should faithfully support the kingdom in every way. However, it is all but incredible that one (a preacher, even) would use spiritual weakness (granting its existence) as Scriptural grounds for divorce (and likely for remarriage as well).<\/span><\/p>\n This brother bases his \u201cspiritual adultery\u201d premise upon Israel’s numerous Old Testament lapses into idolatry. Clearly, God’s prophets called such \u201cadultery\u201d (Jer. 3:8; Eze. 23:37ff). Spiritual adultery <\/em>aptly describes their practice since it involved a \u201cspiritual\u201d union with illicit partners (idols). However, it is quite a different matter to use such as a pretext for divorcing one’s mate.<\/span><\/p>\n Note the following about this perverted position:<\/span><\/p>\n This brother has a bad case of \u201cloopholeitis\u201d\u2014he is looking for a \u201cloophole\u201d in God’s marriage law. We cannot restrain him from doing what he wants to do, but he should not try to justify it with such a ridiculous excuse as this, pretending that it is thereby Scripturally sanctioned. I do not know about this man’s wife, but for sure, one who would concoct such a bizarre theory as this is guilty of \u201cspiritual adultery.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n [Note:<\/strong> I wrote this article for and it was published in The Lighthouse, <\/em>weekly bulletin of Northpoint Church of Christ, Denton, TX, September 7, 2014, of which I was editor.]<\/span><\/p>\n Attribution:<\/strong> From thescripturecache.com<\/em>; Dub McClish, owner and administrator.<\/span><\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Views: 3[Note:\u00a0 This MS is available in larger font on our Brief Articles 2\u00a0 page.] Just when I think I have \u201cheard it all,\u201d something else comes along to prove that I had not. This is particularly true of the subject of marriage, divorce, and…<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n