Now or Not?

Visits: 18

[Note: This MS is available in larger font on our Brief Articles 1 page.]

A pesky stumblingblock to proofreaders is catching the “correct error”—the word that is spelled correctly, but is the wrong word. Failure to note these flaws can result in everything from nonsense to saying the opposite of one’s intent. Consider: “That which for some time was prevalent among men is not appearing among women.” The author meant to say, “is now appearing,” but the not-for-now slip reversed his meaning. Thus the mistaken use of only one letter in one word can have a profound effect.

In Biblical matters examples abound wherein men intentionally substitute their own notfor God’snow, thus contradicting the very Word of God Almighty, for example:

  • “This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh” (Gen. 2:23). Adam spoke these words upon observing that God had made Eve of one of his ribs. The evolutionist’s version of this statement of fact is, “This is not bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh, but she evolved from a lower form over millions of years.” The humanists and materialists thus deny even a hint of “intelligent design” (never mind the infinite Designer and Creator) by changing only one letter of one word in the only accurate account of the origin of womankind. 
  • “But now we have been discharged from the law” (Rom. 7:6), referring to the Law of Moses. Men have changed God’s now to their own not: “But we have not been discharged from the law.” Judaizers in the first century did so, seeking in vain to bind circumcision on the church (Acts 15:1). Roman Catholicism has borrowed heavily not only from paganism, but also from the Law of Moses, including its exclusive priesthood, vestments, holy water, incense, and candles. The 16thcentury reformers likewise made (and their progeny make) the same fatal error, thus justifying such things as infant “baptism,” sprinkling, tithing, sabbath-keeping, and instrumental music. It could not be more plainly stated: The authority of Moses’ Law died when Jesus died (Col. 2: 14; Heb. 9:15–17; et al.). Those who submit to its authority in one point are obligated to submit to all of it (Gal. 5:3), but in doing so, they fall from God’s grace (v. 4).
  • “The like figure whereunto baptism doth also now save us” (1 Pet. 3:21a). Millions have been convinced by their teachers and preachers that the New Testament teaches, “Baptism doth also not save us”—it is not necessary to the sinner’s salvation. One must choose between an inspired apostle and mere men who deny what he plainly stated. Not only did Peter, but also the Lord, Ananias, and Paul also placed baptism before salvation (Mark 16:16; Acts 22: 16; Rom. 6:3–4; Gal. 3:27). 

Upon only one wrong letter of one word may hang one’s eternal destiny—hardly an insignificant error.

[Note: I wrote this article for and it appeared in the Denton Record-Chronicle, Denton, TX, August 24, 2012.]

Attribution: From TheScripturecache.com, owned and administered by Dub McClish. 

 

 

Author: Dub McClish

4 thoughts on “Now or Not?

  1. It is truly sad how close so many can be to the truth and deny a word, a step or a verse that could make thedifference in heaven or hell as their eternal destiation.

    1. Dear Anonymous,

      Thanks for your response and your observation that I have also seen many times over the years. We must continue to get the Truth of God’s Word to as many as we can, ever hoping and praying that the seed of the kingdom will find some honest and good soil. Please visit The Scripture Cache  often.

      Yours in the Cause,

      Dub McClish

  2. Dub, you should add Rom. 8:1: “Therefore, there is NOT no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus.” This reflects the belief of many faithful Christians, including the wife of a former elder that I know. God intends for us to have confidence in our salvation and to live in the joy of our relationship with Jesus.

    1. Dear Steve,

      I’m glad you stopped by The Scripture Cache. Yes, Rom. 8:1 and many other statements could easily have been cited. However, my newspaper articles were limited to approximately 500 words. Please don’t be a stranger to TSC.

      Yours in the Cause,

      Dub McClish

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *